Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Right...

I have very recently entered the world of journalism, and therefore I like to keep myself updated on the happenings around me. I generally read ‘Tehelka’, as I find it giving me information on things mostly missed (an oversight or intentionally, I do not know) by the mainstream media. Also I personally believe that ‘Tehlka’ does ask some basic and fundamental questions, which the mainstream media hell-bent on making a fool out of itself almost always refuses to ask. So, a victim of my habit of getting the most accurate (I think and hope so) or at least the most sensible information, I once again logged on to Tehelka’s official website. The cover story this time was about the case that in my opinion should win the ‘most- blown- out- of- proportion-not- even- that- high- profile- a – case’ award. Yes, you have guessed it right; it’s the Arushi murder case.
When I saw Arushi’s face smiling down at me from the cover picture, I groaned inwardly. My first thought was, Oh no! Not again. I expected better from you ‘Tehelka’. I expected you to give me other important news which is being blatantly ignored by our mainstream. I expected you to tell me about something on Naxalites in Bihar or some other tragedy like the water problems in Bhopal, which are not even considered to be news worthy anymore by our so called national newspapers and news channels. But alas! You have also joined the popular bandwagon and are out with your own theory of the murder.
It’s not like I had any issues with Arushi. Hell, I wasn’t even aware that she existed. That is until a month ago, when suddenly every news channel was talking about the cruel murder of Arushi by everyone and anyone. The way the police was accusing people left- right and center, and the way the media was coming up with its own theory, it seemed like either Arushi was this super-girl and was attacked again and again by the evil lord, as she just didn’t die the first time she was attacked, or else she did die the first time but the father, the compounder, the servant didn’t realize and went again and again to kill her.
If any mainstream media person is reading this, my dear sir, this ridiculous interpretation is what I came up with, from those absolutely ridiculous reports that you, without an iota of evidence or basic common sense put up on your channel.
And by the way, with the entire circus around this case, no one even bothered to talk to her friends or extended family, or ask the police about the three glasses in the drawing room or why didn’t it dust the house or at least her room for finger prints and what the hell was the time of the murder?
All we saw and heard was how she was a characterless girl desperate to sleep around with any goddamm man! “She was found in a compromising position with her servant”; “She used to chat with boys”. Firstly, was anyone present there to see how and with whom she was found in her room? Or was that servant even there in the room to be in a compromising position with her? Secondly, if a 14 year old does not talk with boys or for arguments sake (although no one has any proof) flirt with boys, who will? I mean she was a teenager. And that’s what teenage is all about. Crushes, boy friends, flowers, chocolates, rains, holding hands and blushing furiously if a boy/girl the one you like, even just smiles or turns to look at you. That’s the age when we all have crushes, which are taken so seriously by us, that we think that we are the Romeo’s and Juliet’s of this world. So even if that girl used to flirt or go out with boys, what’s so scandalizing about it? And how the hell is she characterless by doing this, when we all go through this wonderful stage called the teenage?
So, you can understand my exasperation with the whole case. Initially I ignored the article and went ahead to read about other things. However, my curiosity to know what ‘Tehelka’ has to say about this case, got better off me and I clicked on the story. Reading the first paragraph itself made me realize that finally I will know what exactly is the case all about. I shall proudly pronounce that my faith was not shattered, and the feeling of disappointment not allowed to take over me.
I came to know a lot more about the girl Arushi and not just the victim. Her relationship with her parents and friends were explored in a delicate yet detailed manner. Her social life was discussed, but not to malign her, but to add a personality to a mere name. And finally the basic questions were asked and the protectors of justice were called upon for a much needed explanation.
However when I was reading about her father and the relationship she shared with him, I was reminded of my own father. My father loves me and he completely spoils me by fulfilling all my wishes before they are even out of my mouth. He just can’t say no to me, no matter what my demands are. Even if he says no, all I have to do is bring a few tears in my eyes and he simply won’t be able to stand his ground, and say yes immediately.
Arushi’s father according to the report was the same. I then started thinking, how can he have killed her? I know my father won’t even allow a fly to hurt me, let alone he himself being a source of pain. No matter how big a mistake I have committed in his eyes. Then the images of her father being held by the police and all the accusations made on him by the police, media, my very own friends and family, started forming in my head.
I was scared. Scared because it suddenly hit me how quickly we judge people without even giving them a chance to defend themselves? How we always try to put another person, any person in a bad light and stand up as the wiser, morally right and the protectors of justice. How we are so damm insecure that we will try and put absolutely any random person on the slaughter table, without even knowing what their crime is, and persecute them using our weapons of suspicion.
Isn’t it a fact that the middle-class is enjoying itself splashing mud on this family because they will hate it if there is no scandal involved in the case? Because scandal will mean having a person or two who have a dark side to their personality, and then everyone can feel good about their much flaunted morally right and “good” side.
I wonder will we ever be able to get over this insecurity and start accepting things the way they are and looking at situations from all the aspects and in a way that they deserve to be looked at.

15 comments:

PUJA CHAKRABORTY said...

Well.....to start with,more than actually thinking about how the society is changing and the role of media, u have actually interiolized the whole incident and going through a period of catharsis......understood, this incident has left an indelible mark on our consciousness...but that is how relationships are changing.....
In an age when we have heard so many cases of molestations by the patriarchy, daughters raped by their father...why is it so hard for you to believe that a daughter has been murdered by her father???......u being a Journalist should not just go by her case studies , diaries and run into conclusions....Conclusions and investigations are been done by the CBI......the media is definitely not following the public perception, media has not even tried to assasinate Aarushi's character...it has just mouthed what the investigation says......it is supposed to do that...ya, if u wanna critisize the media for overhyping the case as u say that u didn't even know such a girl existed before May 16then i would second that.... but it has also shaken the media to some extent and just to prevent people from loosing complete trust on filial relationships which might lead to a complete deconstruction which is anyways happening to the burgeoning class; the media has been so vigorously tracking this incident, there is no point in doting over the father or exonerating him just by seeing the cards and the pampered atmosphere created by AaRUSHI'S PARENTS...THE NEEDLE OF SUSPICION IS ON ONE AND EVERYBODY AND BEING A JOURNALIST.....i think we gotta share a part of the blame too atleast till the truth is out.....how on earth can a person decide what happened on that very day?? Who knows what the future is?? It's hard to believe, that is smthing which is known to us.....but absolving somebody( i mean the father) who has been charged by the CBI already is equally irresponsible.....no point personalising the incident.....that would make you obviously bias...'Who Can', ever think it's the father!!!!

Unknown said...

my dear i agree with you that we being the journalist have to say wht the police does....but dnt we as the journalists have to also question thm and ask them the basis of their claims? arent we as the journalists also hold the responibility to not just take the police or the accused POV and give a balanced picture? and we as journalist not suppose to speculate and not give our opinions. Dont we have a responsibilty to use the information that we have access to in a mindful manner? And what will u say about all the personal chats of Arushi being floated around in the media? The way our precious journalist are talking about her chracter? And yes in this time daughters are getting killed by their father and raped by them. But who gives us the right to accuse every father of this henious crime? and wwhy may i ask withouth any proof is our media making her father out to be killer and not pressurizing the judiciary which is blatantly ignoring the fact that there is no eveidence against the guy? This article was about how our media is not asking the question it is suppose to. My views about her father was mine. And yes it was personal. Becuase thats how its suppose to be. To be logical Mainstream Media GIVE ME SUM FACTS!

PUJA CHAKRABORTY said...

The facts are all there...much as media grilled us with Aarushi's character, it did cover the protest against AArushi's character assasination...and remember the assasination was not done by media, it was the Noida Police's prerogative, media just flouted it coz there wasn't much evidence and it had to report facts, it did compensatye for the same as in......much as it accused the father too based on statements by CBI, it has also showcased the relationship that Aarushi shared with her father........the only fact is that the hulabaloo created is objectionable coz there are 100people who are murdered on a daily basis...
Having said that i still think that this very incident has caught the media and the nation's attention becoz the nature of murder turns the very foundation of society upside down......

PUJA CHAKRABORTY said...

Coming to the point of evidences, the media has not yet accused Rajesh Talwar, it has also questioned and has projected the evidences given out by the CBI regarding why Rajesh's bail was rejected. The evidences are known to you and me....The media has come up with the statements in the application by the CBI where it says that the keys of Aarushi's room was found with Rajesh Talwar after the deceased locked her room at 11.45.....which is quite a good ground or evidence so rto say that Rajesh Talwar might have been the murderer.........Evidences are all there, but just having access to information doen't necissitate the fact that u have to detail the whole incident on a platter....some information needs to be held back so to avoid irresponsible Journalism.....just in the quest to confirm, re-confirm and cross-check.........Being an insider i know how it's been like so can't stop debating and i think you should also think a little about the ROLE OF MEDIA rather than the ROLE OF FATHER........

Unknown said...

ur contradicting urself puja my love....as u said responsible journalism is where u knw how much info to give and whn...u & I we were both thought this...and the character assasination allthough done by the police was hyped up by the media...for allthough we as media do knw sumthng abt her tht mite malign her character but hv absolutely NO PROFF of....shud question the police abt the evidence..( tht shud have been done for everythng bu well...i already wrote a lot abt it)...nd shudnt just accept the police version nd keep reapting ourselves like moronic monkeys...

Buzz said...

Give some respect to the departed soul! Are you too very much alike most journalists trying to make a quick one in the name of that poor girl. Are there no other topics? Even if you want to throw some light on the topic, guess you should have omitted the name.

An innocent minor of an age you once have been. Me, I was a crook at that age...err.. just joking

Unknown said...

sorry Mr. buzz....ur right....but well we did have a point didnt we....anyway may i knw ur name plz?

Buzz said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Buzz said...

Puja Chakraborty... Do you not think, its both the duty and the responsibility of the media and the journalists to not defame a person with out knowing the absolute truth that would be out only after the investigation.

And what most have been upto is to sensationalise the issue with a lot of analisis based on assumptions? Assumptions are the mother to all F!@#ups.

Are the Jouranalists and the Media the Investigators or the Law? How many are a pro in Criminology or psycology or psychiatry? Is'nt it the media is trying to manipulate the thoughts of the investigators into believing something of the media's choice, exactly like in the case where the western media made believe the whole world of the existence of WMDs and creating a war destorying an entire country's life.

Again like you have concluded that the CBI has charged the father and so is the guilty. Please do go through the entire story, the CBI has not until now officially declared anything. Madam, note he the father is just an accused and shall not be termed guilty until proven so through a fair trial and investigation.

Consider that Father in your own Father's place and if if you still assume him to be guilty with no proof, you need help.

My question why is the Mother not under arrest? Why is the Father not given a chance like the Mother - is he too not human? Why is there no much hype about the poor servant who too dies - there probably is a whole family left behind whose only bread winner was him?

One of the basic basic rules of journalism is to not be baised or hammer on to the society your belief - but to let the public know of the truth. What if the Father is innocent and proved undoubtfully to be so - what would your reaction then be?

The issue I see very clearly here is that if there is any crime a man is guilty...period!! - Thats the mentality all of us have been groomed and bred to from our childhood.

Buzz said...

One more thing which is a known fact, is that during the course of an investigation only the unharmfull data is disclosed to the media with an intention to eye wash the actual culprit and lead him into a trap with all the evidences.

So actually the whole affair of keeping the Father behind bars, allegating the compounder, etcs may be a total eyewash to keep the media and the journolists busy creating analysis and paraylsing the society.

90% of them write just based on assumptions, with absolutly no knowledge of even what are the evidences or even a personal interview with the accused or the victims.

Som said...

I too share same concern. I am doing research on "Media Reporting of Parliament" and found that mainstream media is not giving appropriate space to serious debates, speechs or other important parliamentary informations, which are effecting life of common man.

I think, there is need to evolve a self-regulating mechanism for media so we can check ill-stories like Arushi's and can promote positive journalism.

Buzz said...

;0)

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Delhi/No_evidence_against_Aarushis_father/articleshow/3203371.cms

Proves clearly how women like Puja Chakraborty shows a charecter of being a Fanatic - Fanatism is injurious to both Personal Health and the Society too!! And this charecter should never be a part of a true jouranlist's charecter.

The ROLE of the MEDIA & a JOURNALIST is to bring forth to the public only the absolute truth and nothing but the truth with evidences and proofs and not be a gossip monger looking @ making some name and fame by sestionalising and climbing the grave of another human being in the society.

She also shows the charecteristic of looking down at all who do not share her view/point and would do anything or go to any extend in putting down the other person - guess this charecter shows up in her personal, family and professional life.

Som said...

Pal. Thanks for your comment on my blog.

Actually, am not ealier interacted with you. I was searching for some blog on media as am working on a research linked with Parliamentary Reporting and found your post informative. So, i have placed my comment.

It's great to discuss issues like quality of journalism with seasoned writer like you.

Humza Alvi said...

WELL media must b responsible for wat it is promoting ..... nd media is all about target marketing ..... they just emphasis on that part of news ... which according to them is very spicy and cheesy and ppl will care abt them ...........so in other sense ppl like us are also responsible equally ...who just want sum spicy thng to discuss ....and nothin constructive thng to do .......... and this article as all about those ppl ........... who dun think abt the family and ppl connected to the subject on which they r putiin the spot light ........... so its all abt humanity ............ thats wat i think ....i sum1 even did sumthng wrong ...cover it dun expose it !!!!!

Prachi said...

I was reading your blog... I have read the previous one about child abuse ...which is very much prevalent in India in fact in whole world...and now this one for Arushi. I think that something was really wrong otherwise in real life do u ever think ur parents r sleeping in next room and some outsider will just come and kill you so brutally... As far as media is concern they might be doing it for their own benefit... But Arushi was killed while her parents sleeping in next room which is really very sad.. it actually reflects on how our society is changing for worst and how morals are distorted it is becoming